Saturday, August 29, 2009

For Barbara; And Especially For Lynn

I am going to do three things very soon, as soon as I am able: I am going to purchase two books--Barbara Sher's It's Not Too Late If You Start Right Now and E. Lynn Harris's What Becomes of the Brokenhearted.

I loved these books--I don't think it's just the mood I'm in. I have just this week finished library copies of each and have decided both should be in my home, near my desk, somewhere close by. Even if they mostly only sit on a shelf, I'd feel better if they were always within easy reach for those times when I'm down, discouraged and unsure of myself and the validity of my dreams. Both in their way are inspiring reads, though I ended Lynn Harris's beautiful, deeply moving memoir with the sad awareness that, due to his sudden death last month (heart disease?), I'll never have the chance to meet or correspond with this wonderful man. I know he's gone and still I want to write to him right now, just to tell him how much his willingness to share his struggles as a black gay man trying to make his way in the world means to me.

Barbara Sher however is alive and presumably kicking at this writing, and at the close of It's Not Too Late included contact information and encouraged her readers to let her know if her words were helpful and in what ways. I have forever missed my opportunity with the generous and life-affirming Mr. Harris; I will try not to with the witty and wise Ms. Sher. Even if she is unable to reply, I would want to let her know that her book made me completely reconsider what I thought I understood about middle age and second life dreams.

The third thing is I am going to join that Neighborhood Writing Alliance group I've spent three years watching wistfully from a distance. It's free, my work hours have changed so there are at present no scheduling conflicts, they meet within walking distance of home, and the new workshop begins next month. Looks like I'm all out of excuses.

If I get to choose my first writing assignment, I know exactly what it will be. Maybe I'll call it Letter To Lynn.

If not... I'll write it anyway.

Monday, August 24, 2009

My Cat Is Sick And I'm Not Feeling Too Good Either

24 August 2009
Monday Mid-Morning

I’m doing it again.

Waiting for someone to give me permission to do what I know needs to be done without anyone having to tell me.

Specifically, it’s about my cat. It’s time to have her euthanized. I know it even if my mother doesn’t (and really, she might). Lizzie is diabetic and her disease is being exhibited in all kinds of heartbreaking and exasperating ways, from the constant thirst that has her harassing me for milk nearly every time I walk into the kitchen let alone open the refrigerator door, to her opting to lie down in front of her water dish, her chin propped on the edge of her bowl, as she drinks and pauses, drinks and pauses, drinks and pauses. She’s always hungry as well, though it doesn’t seem to matter how often or how much I feed her; her appetite is never sated. She wakes me as early as 3:30am, pleading for the first in a series of feedings, though so far I’m able to hold off until at least 4 or 4:30am.

Then there are her deteriorating elimination habits.

For months now she’s been having trouble keeping both urine and fecal matter insider her litter box, the urine leaking or spraying out of the box chiefly because of the way she angles her body when she steps inside it to pee, flooding the floors and sometimes soaking the wall, bathroom rug and anything else nearby. She’s also pooping outside her box. Regularly. Sometimes on the bathroom rugs but most often on the living room carpeting, usually—though, to our horror, not always—in the early morning hours while we’re still asleep. This even though I have stepped up the care and cleaning of her cat box—which means I’m cleaning the damn thing religiously and still having to clean up after her elsewhere.

Her coat is another area of concern. It badly needs detangling—again—and she probably could benefit from another bath. She will not allow me to comb out even the smallest of tangles, though she does like my “’grooming” her with wadded up soft plastic newspaper sleeves and petting her in the evenings after “we’ve” emptied the trash (she always follows me into the hallway and sits patiently, waiting for my return from the garbage chute). In these bonding moments I have detected what feel suspiciously like tumors here and there on her body; some time ago I began to notice her apparent discomfort whenever she’d try to roll over on her side.
Lizzie also hides a lot now, crawling under my bed even when I’m home and in the room with her. That’s worrisome because I’ve learned that hiding is something many animals do to protect themselves when they’re scared, ill or in pain. She also vomits more often than I’m sure is normal.

Somehow none of this registers with my mother, or barely does. She seems especially unaware of how frequently the cat is peeing and pooping elsewhere probably because I am almost always the one cleaning up the mess, often before she’s seen any evidence of it. Mom is unaware of the tumors, if that’s what they are, because Lizzie resists all my mother’s efforts at physical affection, and she doesn’t notice the hiding behavior because it happens in my bedroom rather than hers and because she’s become accustomed to the cat’s disappearances when I’m not at home and its preference for my company when I am. We’ve talked about the diabetes and she has seen the ramping up of appetite and thirst, but she has (apparently) acclimated herself to that reality such that its larger meaning—the animal is seriously ill and will not get better—doesn’t fully register with her anymore, if it ever did. I don't think she really wants to know.

As before, with another beloved pet some 14 years earlier, it’s becoming clear to me that the burden of deciding the time to end things will fall to me; Mom cannot and will not say goodbye on her own. Her inability to do that comes from heartfelt affection for Lizzie, yes, but also because the animal has come to represent something else to Mom, something more than just a pet. It’s almost like she and I are a couple in a faltering marriage—I know how bizarre that reads but that’s how it feels—and the cat is the child that has been keeping us together. I don’t want to trivialize or ignore my mother’s feelings, but neither do I want to be ruled by them. Dealing with this animal’s problems is becoming stressful; this is a quality of life issue for me, too. I can’t leave the decision to her—she doesn’t want to know.

All that said, what do I do and when do I do it?

My mother says we shouldn’t have Lizzie euthanized until we’re sure she’s in pain, but the problem with that logic is at least twofold: first, when would someone as generally unobservant as my mother notice when that particular threshold had been reached, especially given the cat’s tendency to hide? And second, how much silent suffering should the cat have to endure before finally Mom could bring herself to agree that she should not be allowed to suffer anymore?

The last vet visit was back in March of this year. That was when Dr. W. laid it all out for me, after Lizzie’s blood and urine lab tests came back. He suggested daily insulin shots would likely help Lizzie’s symptoms and buy her more time, but the realities of the treatment and ongoing costs make that an unworkable solution. Euthanasia was all that was left and though I felt terrible for even thinking it, I was tempted right then and there to say to Tom, “Let’s just do this and get it over with.” Had I still been living alone, I probably would have.

But I’m not, and this living arrangement with my mother has complicated things. I know she wants to believe this is “our” cat and thus “our” decision to make though in her heart she must know the cat is really mine. This is as true now as it was 11 years ago when, after making it brutally clear to my mother that there would be no more pets, period, I did a guilt stricken about-face and brought Lizzie home to the Hyde Park apartment we shared. Though Mom became quite fond of Lizzie, she was content to let me be the pet mother, the one who actually tended to its needs, from keeping the icky litter box clean to ferrying it back and forth for check-ups, grooming and yearly shots; Mom loved the pleasure of the animal's company but not, particularly, the nitty-gritty of its care. Not surprising, it was with me the cat most strongly bonded and when, after another few years, my mother and I parted company and I decided to take Lizzie with me, Mom gave no argument.

But a few years later my financial fortunes changed for the worse and we all moved in together again (Lizzie surprising us both with her steadfast refusal to accept my mother’s determined attempts at getting reacquainted), and… here we are, faced with this, or rather me faced with this.

Faced with doing what I know needs to be done without anyone having to tell me to do it.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

More Queerty

I wandered into a Queerty.com thread again, and felt compelled to post this in response to a fierce and freewheeling debate--which as far as I could tell was entirely male--involving the suggestion of homophobic behavior and/or attitude from NBA legend Shaq O'Neal and actor Demetri Martin during their recent appearance on The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien.

Full disclosure: I did not catch that particular Tonight Show or even watch the posted clip of it. However, through the exchanges between the commenters I understood that Martin, who in the new movie Taking Woodstock plays a real-life gay man who was instrumental in the creation of the iconic 1969 music festival, talked to Conan about having to kiss a guy in the film. Apparently O'Neal then slid away from Martin as if to express repulsion at the idea of two men kissing; that, or mock fear that Martin would try to kiss him.

In response to this, some commenters went after O'Neal, others insisted Shaq was unfairly taking the brunt of the criticism over the episode and charged racism, and still others generally opined that there was plenty of blame to go around, expressing annoyance at (presumably) straight actors who sign on to play gay characters and then moan to the press about how "challenging" such roles are, and also at Conan O'Brien, who must have something of a history of homophobic joking around in his comedy. (I guess. I'm not particularly a Conan fan, so I can't say for sure.) Even Taking Woodstock director Ang Lee came in for an angry scolding for not casting gay actors in his movies' main roles... Anyway the commenting back and forth over this, and other issues it led to, was so heated, with so many good points getting mixed in with a lot of sneering, testosterone-fueled zingers, that I couldn't resist joining in (though, admittedly, I rattled on rather longer than I should have for forums like this):

We ARE all essentially on the same side here, aren't we? Or at least most of us? It's kind of hard to tell what with all the shouting, name-calling and insult-slinging. (You're a pretty lively group, lol.) Several thoughts came to me as I read all the back and forth of these comments; hope y'all don't mind my sharing a few...


1) I know it's Shaq's appearance on Conan--sorry, The Tonight Show--that kicked off the raging debate, but somehow my thoughts wandered to Magic Johnson's appearance on Arsenio Hall's show nearly twenty years ago, after he had tested positive for HIV and announced his immediate retirement from basketball. In answer to the rumors that he was gay, Magic told Arsenio he was not, saying "...I'm a long way from that." Arsenio smiled and the studio audience exploded with cheers. I wanted to throw up, I was so disgusted with Johnson. It was his tone, the way he said what he did, that got to me. I remember thinking: Fuck you, Magic. Is it really necessary to play to all the bigots out there? You can't find a way to say the words "It's not true" without the insulting insinuation?

Admittedly, this is not the same as the Shaq controversies, but it came floating back to me anyway.


2) The victimhood issue-- as a black lesbian entering her fifth decade, I can kind of speak to that. A lot depends on how and where you grew up, of course, but if you are a member of a group that has historically suffered serious and significant discrimination--some of it irritating in its subtlety, some of it scarily overt--over-sensitivity becomes a kind of occupational hazard, especially if you're a member of both tribes and find yourself constantly having to deal with one tribe's dissing the other.

I have been to queer events where mine was the only face of color and the freeze-out (especially from the guys; not sure why) was such that I couldn't bear to stay in the room. I have also found myself at noisy odds with black family, neighbors and coworkers (especially the women--don't ask) who frankly found the gay stuff "unnecessary" and even "disgusting"-- even as they insisted that they personally had "no problem" with gay people. (Riiiight...)


3) And as to Ang Lee, and the issue of straight actors playing gay roles... sigh. Are we sure we're in command of all the facts about this? I'm not convinced a gay actor, out or not, could have brought more nuance and heartbreak to the role of Ennis Del Mar than did Heath Ledger, though, yes, it did get increasingly annoying watching one entertainment reporter after the next "sympathetically" prompt Ledger about how "uncomfortable"-- read: having to kiss and simulate-fuck Jake Gyllenhaal--the role must have been to, um, play. (And excuse me, but just how was that so damn hard really? I'm a dyke--I'm not blind or dead.)

On the other hand, how many talented, hunky gay actors felt safe taking on such a role? How many of them worried that doors would softly close around them and they'd never be seriously considered for an action or straight romantic lead role ever, or ever again? How many might actually have been eager to play Ennis or Jack but were warned away by their (closeted?) agents, managers, and publicists? Do we know who was on Mr. Lee's short list for the main characters of all his queer-themed films, and who turned him down for the reasons just mentioned?


Again, reading your arguments about this, my thoughts turned to another time and place: I recalled reading about the difficulty Alfred Hitchcock encountered when trying to cast for his film "Rope," the movie loosely based on the 1920s Leopold-Loeb murder case (Think it was Arthur Laurent's autobio that detailed this). Hitchcock had wanted Cary Grant in the professor role, and the beautiful and exciting newcomer Montgomery Clift in the role of one of the murderous young men.

Alas. Neither Grant nor Clift, both gay, would go near the roles. Both were aware of the famous case that inspired the story, and may have known the real-life protagonists had been lovers--though of course that's only hinted at in the 1948 film-- and were apparently afraid the homoerotic subtext would mean trouble for them. (Grant's character was also originally envisioned as a former lover of one of the young men.) I think it was handsome Farley Granger--quite good (and, ironically, also gay)--who took the role meant for Clift. And it was stalwart, straight as a stick James Stewart who played the young killers' ex-teacher, a piece of casting which changed the entire tone of the film. Stewart brought moral umbrage, but not much else, to the proceedings, seeming to have no clue what was really going on.


My point is that, as much as we might like to think so after all this time, not all that much has significantly changed for young hottie actors (especially males) in Hollywood. They are still told to keep their heads down and play it "safe" if they want a chance at a Serious, Big-Ticket Career in showbiz (or for that matter, team sports), and the status quo remains largely intact. Unfortunately.

PS: I sincerely apologize for the length of this comment, guys. Stepping off the soapbox now.

Yeah. A tad long. But I feel better, how 'bout the rest of you?

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Charles Perez and The Continuing Facts of Life

Just read a story on Queerty.com (posted five days ago) about the saga of Charles Perez, who was first demoted to weekend anchor and later fired outright from his anchorman gig at Miami's ABC affiliate WPLG for, it is strongly suspected, the crime of Delivering The News While Openly Gay. Perez is fighting back, having lodged a complaint of discrimination; the case is pending with the Equal Opportunity Board. I was interested, as always, in the comments posted by readers; one of them really grabbed my attention, opining:

"You shouldn't be discriminated against for being gay, but you shouldn't bring the fact that you are gay to the workplace overtly (emphasis mine) either. "

I read that one twice, shaking my head, which was flooding with memories of workplaces past. I decided to register with Queerty, just so I could respond to that particular comment--which had to have been made by an extremely young and naive, or willfully obtuse, person. This is, in the main, what I posted in response:

Excuse me, please?? That statement completely ignores the fact--the FACT--that hetero workers think nothing of bringing the fact of THEIR sexual orientation into the workplace, "overtly" or otherwise, every single day!

I've been a working adult for nearly 3 decades now. In every office or workspace where I have been employed, straight fellow employees have proudly displayed on their cubicle walls and desks all manner of evidence of their personal lives, especially scads of photos of their kids and spouses or significant others. The marrieds come to work each day grousing--sometimes jokingly, sometimes not--about life with their Better Half, the singletons come in with glowing details about last night's hot rendezvous and an eagerly anticipated weekend getaway with the latest object of their affection... unless, that is, they come in bemoaning the latest loser they felt compelled to endure on the previous evening's travesty of a date.

Either way, you can't get away from the information overload--don't get me started on what happens with the approach of St. Valentine's Day--and given how much of their lives working people spend on the job, it's really not surprising.

And as for dealings with "the public" (which presumably would include customers and clients)-- just how is a gay person supposed to respond when "the public" brings up personal matters, chatting about their own family and/or love life--and then asking you about yours? People do that you know, and even in these post-Ellen, post-Will & Grace, post-Queer As Folks times, straight people have an annoying tendency to assume that everyone in the room is hetero like them.

What do you do if you're not hetero like them? Are we really expected to lie? Why should we have to? Why are the rules still different for some?


Perhaps I should have included as post script: Can you hear me, Mr. "Change We Can Believe In"?

And Debutante of the Year 1944 at Age 15

Her Films:

1941 Citizen Kane............................................... Orson Welles

1942 The Magnificent Ambersons................... Orson Welles

1943 Shadow of a Doubt................................... Alfred Hitchcock

1944 Laura................................................... Otto Preminger
Les Enfants du Paradis............................ Marcel Carne

1946 My Darling Clementine............................ John Ford
The Big Sleep............................................ Howard Hawks

1947 Black Narcissus......................................... Michael Powell
The Paradine Case.................................... Alfred Hitchcock

1948 Letter from an Unknown Woman.......... Max Ophuls

1949 Madame Bovary....................................... Vincente Minnelli
She Wore a Yellow Ribbon...................... John Ford

1950 Pandora and the Flying Dutchman........ Albert Lewin

Monday, August 17, 2009

To Whom It Might Possibly Concern

August 17, 2009
Monday

Folks,

Having been unceremoniously dumped into a "fee-based" technical support system without my prior knowledge or consent--this after having been placed on hold several times by a customer service rep who plainly had no idea how to help me with my problems--my disappointment with the "___ _______ ___ Experience" is now complete.

Therefore please find enclosed your ___ kit returned, and at my expense, I might add. Henceforth I'll look elsewhere for a ___ service that is truly both affordable and easy to install and use.

It's too bad, really.

Initially I was excited about ___'s (finally!) offering a ___ service, especially since the monthly cost seemed reasonable and, unlike ___, I could look forward to the benefit of ___ without the annoyance of being locked into a yearlong contract. Additionally, as an ___ customer, I could try the _________ ___ service for two months free (per the original sign-up offer); I decided to send for the ___ kit.

Then it arrived-- my _____ ______ confirmation arrived a bit later--and my headaches began.

I was less than pleased to discover (as I own an earlier model _______without a ___ ____) I would have to go out and purchase a ___ or ______ ____ in order to make the hook-up work; I did so nevertheless, deciding with the help of a salesperson to purchase a ___. I followed the directions of the accompanying manual carefully, installed the ___ ____, hooked up the ___ kit (using the blue ___ _____), inserted the ___ set-up CD-ROM into the drive, and... the first screen of the ___ set-up wizard warned that the ___ could not be detected. Something was wrong.

I uninstalled everything and tried again; still no connection. Baffled, I called ___'s tech support hot-line seeking help. I spoke to a very nice customer support person who tried to walk me through a manual installation of the ___ so that the ___ system would recognize it; no success. Finally, this individual suggested that the _______ ____ might be easier for the ___ set-up system to detect.

Accordingly, I returned the ___ to the store from which I'd purchased it, exchanging it for Microsoft's _______ ____. I read the installation and set-up manual carefully, following its instructions with its CD-ROM. I hooked up the ___ again (this time using the red _______ _____), inserting the set-up CD-ROM again, aaaand.... once again the set-up wizard's first screen warned that the ____ could not be detected.

Something was wrong. Again.

Again, I backed out of everything, again I shut down my ________, unhooked the power cord from my ________, re-read the set-up manual(s), and re-installed the ____ (this time in a different available ____), replaced the cover of my ________, and attempted the set-up again.

Again, no luck.

Frustrated, I called ___'s tech support again, and once again I encountered an amiable support person who seemed baffled by my installation problems, suggesting I try this and that, to no avail. He placed me on hold to briefly assist another support person nearby; he came back, he asked me more questions, made more suggestions, and placed me on hold again.

He returned again, and hemmed and hawed, obviously uncertain of what to tell me; he asked me to hold again. I held. And held.

Next thing I knew I was listening to an automated voice "welcoming" me to ___'s "fee-based technical support service." This was the last straw.

So, here is your ___ back. Whatever benefits there may have been to using this thing are simply not worth the (considerable) aggravation of trying to set it up and get it going.

Late in the year last year, I ended my service with ___. By that time I'd experienced little glitches and inconveniences with that service just annoying enough to compel me to quit it when the contract finally ended. If absolutely nothing else, I did not want to be locked into another yearlong commitment.

Well. One thing I can say about their ___ that cannot be said about your ___: if you signal interest in their ___ service, they take the trouble to find out what sort of equipment you're using so they can then determine what kind of ___ ________ ___to send, and everything you'd need is included when it arrives, including a compatible ________ or ___ ____. You don't find yourself having to pony up even more cash (you may not have right now) to make it all work.

May I trust it's safe to assume I will NOT be charged for this vexing misadventure? I never made it to the trial period, after all, let alone past it.

Thank (almost said something else) You,

The Disgusted Miss M.